Service classification, Annex IV capital, the Article 67 calculation, PSD2 exposure, route selection, and the business model screens that stop an application before it starts.
Every rule traces to a named provision of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114. Where a question cannot be answered from your inputs, the engine returns a verify item rather than a guess.
Sample resultA verified worked example, not your firm and not generated from your data.
Required own funds
EUR 225 000
Binding: overheads limb
Annex IV floor · Class 2
EUR 125 000
Blockers found
3
Each traced to a provision
Blocker
A second authorisation is required under PSD2
The firm moves e-money tokens on behalf of clients. Transfers of e-money tokens carried out for a client are payment services, and a MiCA authorisation does not cover them.
Action: Apply for a payment institution or e-money institution authorisation alongside the CASP application, or remove client-facing EMT transfers from the perimeter.
Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2), Annex I · MiCA Article 60(4)
Blocker
Retention of interest earned on client fiat is prohibited
Funds held for clients must be safeguarded and any benefit arising on them belongs to the client, so keeping the interest earned on client fiat balances cannot be part of the business model.
Action: Pass the interest to clients or restructure the revenue model away from float income before filing.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, Article 70
Blocker
External withdrawals require the transfer permission
Allowing clients to withdraw to an address the firm does not control is the provision of transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients, and it is not covered by the custody permission alone.
Action: Add the transfer service to the application, or disable withdrawals to addresses outside the firm's control.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, Article 3(1)(26) and Annex IV
Deterministic analysis from the named instruments. Not legal advice and not a substitute for licensed counsel in your jurisdiction.